Frustrated Trader – Don’t Buy Gap Ups Near the Open!

Question:

I appreciate all the upgrades you’ve made to selfinvestors.com since I
started subscribing in July.  However, about the only thing I’ve accomplished,
since resuming my active investing last June, has been to limit my
losses.  After numerous trades, my only significant gain was 21% on DHB.

I’m sure some of this resulted from poor decisions on my part.  But one
problem is that, even if I could arrange to watch specific stocks in
real time and/or receive your buy & sell e-mails in a timely manner, my
day job doesn’t lend itself to making immediate trades.  With few
exceptions, I must make my buy & sell decisions in the evening or early
in the morning–before the market opens & before you send your buy &
sell e-mails.

Last night I made another decision that is not working out well.  After
reading about OMM on your watch list, I researched it at investors.com
& other internet sites.  The fundamentals & earnings report seemed very
good, and the stock was up nicely in after-hours trading.  I bought at
the open today (with a limit order) and am already down more than 7%.

I’m seriously wondering whether I should return to investing in mutual
funds–which I don’t find particularly interesting.

I’d welcome your comments.  Thank you.

My Response:

As far as the time issue I understand.  Other members have expressed similar
concern about implementing this method successfully while maintaining a full
time job.  It can be done.  I’m willing to work with you until you are
successful if you’re willing.  You sound like you are.

A couple of key things from what you are telling me:
1.  I think I have mentioned this a couple to times before in emails, but
now I realize I haven’t highlighted this enough.  It is very important.  You
almost NEVER want to buy a stock in the first half hour of trading,
ESPECIALLY on a gap up after an earnings report.  In the first half hour
trading, overnight orders are filled and there is much manipulation going on
from market makers.  You get a much more accurate direction of a stock after
that first half hour.  In the OMM example, I was looking to pull the trigger
only if it proved the breakout.  What do I mean by this?  It proves the
breakout only if the stock clears the high that it made in the first half
hour.  The stock never confirmed a buy.  In your situation you probably
would not have been around long enough to wait to see if it would confirm a
purchase – what you could have done is set a buy stop order above the high
point of the first half hour.  The order will execute only if it clears the
high for the first half hour (you would just need to make sure that the high
point of that first half hour would still be within 5% from the pivot, which
in this case I would have been).

That is one strategy.  A safer strategy would be to just hold off on the
breakout and wait for a return to the pivot area, which about half of stocks
will do.  There is nothing wrong with holding off on the initial breakout
and waiting for the stock to return to an acceptable buy range (0 – 5% from
the breakout point).  The Buy Watch screen lists stocks near a breakout, but
also lists stocks that are still within an acceptable buy range.  For
example, INFY remains in a buyable range, but I’m waiting for a drop to
around the 72 range before entering.  There is a good chance the stock could
do this in the morning when you are able to watch or you could set a buy
limit order at 72, so that your order gets filled if it drops to that point.
DOW is another great company highlighed that has been slow to breakout which
could have been purchased this morning.

Good, But Not Great

The market capped off another solid week, with an impressive advance Friday as weak jobs data temporarily alleviated fears that interest rates will rise rapidly.  On the surface, it looks like the market will shoot to the moon.  But the bulls better keep the champagne on ice for now.  While the S&P500 and DOW have cleared resistance of their 50 day moving averages, the Nasdaq continues to lag.  In addition, buy volume remains tepid.. at least for larger cap names.  Over the last several days there has been a clear divergence in buy interest between small caps and large caps.  Wasn’t this the year that large caps were supposed to lead?  So much for the opinions of highly paid market pundits.. they’ve been predicting the outperformance of large caps for quite some time.  The strength in small caps has been impressive, but buy volume will have to pick up in the major indices in order to declare an all out buy signal.  While it’s OK to initiate long positions at this time, do so with some caution.  Looking ahead to next week, the earnings report from Cisco on Tuesday will provide important insight into the strength of the tech sector and should be a catalyst for market movement. 

Best Strategy: consider being 50% long at this point and adding additional long positions if the Nasdaq confirms a buy signal (by clearing resistance of the 50 day moving average with heavy volume – see chart below)

Here’s a look at the charts of the major indices.. notice the increase in buy volume as you go from the Dow (big, blue chips) to the S&P600 (small caps).

Semis: Is Fourth Time a Charm?

The chart above is of the Semiconductors Holders Trust (SMH) which I prefer to the SOX index because it provides volume levels.  Notice the dramatic shift to buyers over the past 10 trading days, evidenced by the spike in buy volume and the decrease in sell volume.  On Friday, a spike above resistance of the 50 day moving average provided further confirmation of strength.  But the key will be the all important resistance level of the 200 day moving average, which it has failed to move above on 3 previous occasions.  Keep an eye on the semis this week.. a decisive move above that resistance level could provide a real boost for the Nasdaq and the tech sector.  Should that occur, keep an eye on Tessera Technologies (TSRA) which is currently the highest rated semiconductor stock in the Breakout Tracker (with a score of 55/60).  It looks poised to break out from recent consolidation.

Breakout Tracker Highlights

It was an outstanding week for breakouts last week both in terms of the number of breakouts (25) and the success of those breakouts (not one ended the week with a loss!)

  • The highest ranked breakout for the week (with a score of 53/60) was Cal Dive International (CDIS), which you may remember was highlighted in the oil sector report in last weeks Market Report (seen at SelfInvestors.com).  It ended the week with a 4% gain.
  • Top gainers include CTI Molecular Imaging (CTMI)up 14% and Terra Nitrogen (TNH) up 10%.

Note: For more information on the ranking system used by SelfInvestors.com and the proprietary database of CANSLIM style stocks, please see this page: Breakout Tracker

A Look At the Model Portfolio

Question:

Do the stocks in the "Portfolio" always follow the CANSLIM
criteria.  It seems that some of the "Watch" stocks aren’t always above
$15,  earnings aren’t always in the excellent category, trading volume
is on the slim side, etc.  Are there some CANSLIM criteria that are more
important than others?  Are we mostly looking for breakouts and
interesting technical analysis?  Do I just need a little more experience
in CANSLIM?

My Response:

[the originial response has been edited to reflect changes in the Model Portfolio]

First off, I’ll say that I don’t follow a strict CANSLIM approach but rather elements
of it that are common to many successful investing strategies, such as focusing
on companies that are exhibiting strong earnings/sales growth and technically
superior.  Where I tend to differ is that I won’t hesitate to purchase stocks under
$10/share or that may not have a history of strong earnings but are expected to
increase earnings dramatically in the near future.  In addition I tend to hold more
positions than what would be recommended in a classic CANSLIM approach.

I would characterize the SelfInvestors Model Portfolio as one that ecompasses
a variety of strategies to achieve market beating returns.  Short plays are used
in a market downturn and recently (last half of 2006) I have added the use of ETF’s
and what I call Quick Strike Profit plays (technical swing plays with big short term
profit potential) to add some oomph to portfolio gains.  While the portfolio focuses
almost exclusively on high growth stocks, it’s fairly conservative and well diversifed.

Is It a Bull or Bear Market?

Question:

I am not sure I completely follow how you decide when we are in
a bull or bear market.  I guess I would like a little tutorial in this
area or maybe I should I just be following the "Big Picture" in IBD?  It
seems to me that IBD never really comes right out and says whether they
think it’s a bull or a bear market.

My Response:

The strength of the market, like the strength of an individual stock is determined by price and volume levels as well as support and resistance areas.  I’d say more than half of my time spent on blog articles is focused on the health of the overall market. IBD’s The Big Picture is helpful and you may like to look at the tutorial here.  I suggest you read through the entire tutorial, specifically the section  regarding Market Direction.  Once you’re comfortable with the idea behind that and are familiar with distribution and accumulation, you’ll understand why I track those days in the calendar on the Market Outlook page (accumulation – green days, distribution – red days). 

Zeroing In On A Bottom?

First off, hats off to our troops and the brave people of Iraq who are providing inspiration to others in the Middle East.  Our troops must be proud.  Whether the news results in another forceful market rally is anyone’s guess at this point, although there is little doubt the market will open strong Monday morning.  While a sustained rally into the close on Monday would provide a signal to begin pursuing long positions, it should be met with caution.  Rarely do market corrections bounce back in a V like formation.  Corrections take time to sort out, often retesting the lows a second or third time before a rally can resume. 

Let’s take a look at the charts to get a look at where we’ve been and where we might be going.  Taking a look at the long term view of the Nasdaq, it’s clear that the area around 1980 – 2000 provides a critical level of support.  It’s an area of convergence of 3 major support levels: the psychological support level of 2000, the 200 day moving average around 1980 and the long term trend line which is also near 2000.  I believe we will hold above these levels, but if not, it could signal the end of the bull run.

A closer look at the Nasdaq.  In this view you get a better look at the short term downward trend line of this recent correction which has acted as a source of resistance.  For the rally to continue the Nasdaq will need to fight through this resistance level as well as resistance of the 50 day moving average.   Also notice that critical support area which was highlighted above in the longer term chart.

Gambling With Certainty

We all have a friend or a family member that refers to trading as "legalized gambling".  Well, I would have to agree.  Sort of.  If talking about long term “investing” over the course of 15, 20, 30 years… than clearly, gambling it is not.  Over the course of time, you get closer and closer to that magic number of around 8 -10% a year.  There is little uncertainty of achieving those kinds of gains.  In the long term it is the casino that wins when you gamble.  Sure, you may get lucky here and there, but over the course of time, the casino wins.  Every time. It’s nearly  the perfect business because profits are guaranteed provided you keep cheaters, criminals and other costs in check.  You better believe they do.  In fact, there’s an interesting article about Las Vegas security and how it could have been used to avoid the September 11th attack.  Casino security operators may know more about you than your own mother!

So, how about shorter term “trading”.  Is that gambling?  Considering that the definition of gambling is "to bet on an uncertain outcome with money or property" I would say yes!  However, there is a big difference between trading and casino/sports betting.  The degree of uncertainty of the outcome is MUCH greater when "gambling" at the craps table or placing a bet on your favorite sports team.  Gambling at the craps table is pure chance, void of any skill or knowledge.  The probability of success when placing a bet on your favorite sports team is entirely in the hands of your sports team.  Trading allows YOU to control the probability of success by studying the overall market behavior, the price and volume movement of the stock as well as the company’s fundamentals.  These are all variables you use to steer that degree of uncertainty much closer to zero. 

So I say, take the day off work, invite your buddies over, pour a few cocktails, lay out the buffet and let the buy orders fly!  Why have a good time and lose money when you can have a good time and make money.  The NYSE is thinking about opening a few hours early to generate more revenue?  Why stop there?  Stay open until 2AM Fridays and Saturdays and allow “trading” casinos to operate, complete with prime rib dinners, cocktails and Wayne Newton.  It’s not such a far fetched idea in this gambling crazed world.

Discussion of a Short Trade – Don’t Place Stops At Whole Numbers

Question:

Would you cover on an intra-day bounce above 31 or closing above 31?

My Response:

The reason for waiting until market close would be  to see what the so
called "smart money" will do (institutions do much of their trading in
the last hour of the day).  Many traders will avoid making a sell decision
(or in this case, a cover decision until then).  However, if SFA surges
above 31with heavy volume I would be covering regardless of when that occurs,
considering that volume levels will tell you what institutions are
doing. The only exception might be in the first 30 – 60 min. of trading, where I
typically avoid making any trading decision. 

Follow up question:

Thanks.  Just curious, do you use more of a mental stop than a hard stop
order so you can watch volume?  And if SFA goes above 31 on light volume
will you not sell.

Since I don’t trade full time and have trouble monitoring trades
throughout the day I enter stop orders immediately after a trade has
been entered.  I have placed my stop on SFA at 31.  This seems to work
best for me but always open to suggestions if you have any (I feel exits
are one of the more important aspects to trading and always looking to
improve in this area).

My Response:

Since I am able to watch the market most days, I don’t use stop orders.
This way I can base my decision on volume levels as well as the strength
of the market.  To answer your question, I would be less likely to cover if
the stock rises through resistance with light volume.  Although, it would be
surprising to see it get past those resistance levels with light volume.

Most are not able to watch the market during the day, so you MUST use
stops.  Here’s a hint though.  Never place a stop on a whole number.  You
increase your chances of getting shaken out.  Remember that market makers know
all stop loss levels.  It is human nature to want to set stops at even numbers,
so there will be a large number of stops at those places.  Market makers
may run a stock up in order to cause a short squeeze.  I don’t want to get
too complicated here.. make sure you place stops at odd numbers where others
wont’.  So maybe 31.23 or something like that.

To Buy or Not to Buy: Google

As I write this, Google is breaking above its pivot point of 203.74, but instead of jumping into this one right now, a cautious approach may be a better strategy.  While the stock has carved a mighty impressive base with tight price action (institutions are holding shares tight), buy volume has been lacking throughout (they’re not clamoring for new shares).  In addition, a couple events of events on the horizon will undoubtedly have a major affect on stock price.. earnings in a couple weeks and final phase of the lockup period when millions of additional shares flood the market.  If you’re a regular reader here, you know how I feel about earnings reports.. best to wait for the dust settle.  It will be interesting what Yahoo will report after the bell today, which should provide a glimpse into how well Google will do (at least in the pay per click arena). 

When To Sell Often More Art Than Science – Some Examples & Thoughts (reflecting on my mistakes)

Question:

It looks like you didn’t make the ADBL and CRDN shorts part of the portfolio. Will you notify by email a buy to cover or should I just follow you targets you gave? Both look great so far. I’m kicking myself for not realizing the climax tops of DHB and XXIA as I’m sure you are, too. Good picks but both went down so quickly. Such is life. This is the first time I’ve shorted a stock so I’m pretty anxious about the whole thing. It helps that they both dropped on good volume yesterday. Thanks for your efforts. The web site looks great. Dave

My Response:

ADBL and CRDN are part of the portfolio and will be added there as soon as I tweak the portfolio to allow short positions (I did not expect to be going into short mode so soon when the new portfolio system was built!).  I’m hoping to get a hold of my programmer on Sunday to make the changes.  .. and yes, you absolutely will be notified by email of a buy cover for these positions.  As far as targets go, they can change depending on market conditions, news in the stock, etc.  So I would never carve a target in stone and live by it.  As I mention in that short article, I look to take profits in short trade much sooner than I would in a long trade (although, the strategy would have worked nicely with DHB and XXIA!)… usually around 10 – 15%.  You mention this is your first short sale.. do me a favor Dave and be careful.  Start small with these and ease into it.  I don’t jump in with both feet with short selling either.. maybe put one or two trades on and don’t move to another unless i’ve locked in profits on the initial trades.  This is particularly true in this situation where we are still technically in a bull market.
 
As far as those DHB and XXIA trades go, it was gut wrenching to see big gains wiped away in just days.  When something like that happens it’s important to learn something from it.  What went wrong?  As far as DHB it had all the making of a "big winner" which means that you typically let ‘ride out’.  I was counting on the first couple of weeks of January as positive weeks for the market.  I probably got caught up in this and didn’t put much stock in that big reversal the day after the big news.  I kept thinking that the stock would bounce, but I was wrong (looks like insider selling was too much – I still think bad news is around the corner for this one.)  You have to look at the charts, objectively at all times and listen to what they tell you.  That trade just reminded me of that.  I got caught up in "hoping" for a bounce rather than listening to the "red flag" reversal.  As far as XXIA, I would disagree that it was a climax top.. they usually happen much later in the move of a stock (like in a 3rd or 4th stage base).  However, I did feel that after that big surge in price that it would be difficult for the stock to keep it up (it had already tripled since August).  Again, I wanted to ride out that first week or two of January to see if it had a bit more juice in it..  I was blindsided by the quick sell off.  Yeah, that was the most difficult week that I can remember in a long time, particularly when you add the TASR trade to the mix.  There are times when it seems everything goes wrong and that the market knows you own a particular stock and is out for revenge on YOU and only YOU!.  I know every investor has felt this way at some point.  The good news is there will be better days ahead!

ETF, IPO & Breakout Stocks Analysis, Tracking & Research